Clients consistently praise Clean Break for providing compassionate, clear, and professional guidance during emotionally difficult relationship property matters. Sarah Moon is frequently highlighted for her ability to explain legal concepts in plain language, strong advocacy, and personalized support. Many reviewers mention feeling overwhelmed initially but leaving consultations feeling reassured and informed. The team's responsiveness, efficient processes, and transparency about costs are also commonly appreciated.

Clients consistently praise Andrew Shaw's expertise, empathy, and dedication in family law and complex disputes. Many highlight his clear communication, availability, and ability to achieve far better outcomes than expected. Several reviews mention his strength as an advocate who exposes dishonesty in court. Fees are considered worthwhile for the life-changing results.

Clients consistently praise C & F Legal for exceptional service, professionalism, and quick response times. Many highlight specific staff like Niall, Connor, Kathy, Nicola, and Robyn for their attentive and clear communication. Reviews mention the firm's ability to handle complex matters successfully, with particular appreciation for the friendly and caring team atmosphere. No negative feedback was found.

Clients consistently praise the firm for its professionalism, clear communication, and knowledgeable lawyers, particularly Paul Le Gros, Alex, and Michelle Byczkow. Many highlight positive experiences with commercial and property matters, describing the team as approachable, efficient, and empathetic. A few mention helpfulness in first-home buying and business sales, with no negative feedback.

Clients consistently praise the firm's lawyers as 'best lawyers' and 'very helpful,' highlighting their knowledge and ease in navigating corporate law. Multiple 5-star reviews emphasize positive experiences, calling the staff 'good people working for you.' However, one 1-star review accuses director Nigel McFadden of dishonesty, conflicts of interest, and the firm of illegal activity, though another review dismisses this as inaccurate and written with an axe to grind.

Clients consistently praise Margot (or Margo) for her professionalism, helpfulness, and expertise in family law, with several long-term clients highly recommending her. Positive reviews highlight excellent communication, prompt service, and a friendly atmosphere, especially for property transactions and estate planning. However, there are significant complaints about the firm refusing new clients or taking on the opposing party after declining representation, as well as poor communication, missed deadlines, and unresponsiveness. Some reviewers report feeling discriminated against or receiving incorrect advice, with a few noting a decline in service quality over recent years.

Clients consistently praise Richmond Law for their friendly, efficient staff and easy communication, with many highlighting Stephen Sansom's good work and the firm's long-term service for family matters like wills and estate planning. However, a recurring concern involves a data privacy incident where personal details were emailed to the wrong address, with no apology noted.

Clients describe the firm as very helpful and professional, with excellent customer service and expertise across a wide range of legal matters. Some praise fast, efficient handling of minor matters and clear explanations for property transactions. However, a few reviews mention issues with delayed document processing, overcharging, and poor communication, with one client citing a two-month delay and failure to provide information to a bank. Specific lawyers like Kaye are highlighted as lovely and professional.

Clients describe the team as lovely, knowledgeable, friendly, and understanding while remaining professional. Ross Philipson is specifically praised and recommended for legal advice. However, some clients found the firm very difficult to deal with, indicating inconsistent service.

Clients consistently award a perfect 5/5 score, praising the firm's exceptional service and expertise in maritime law. While specific written reviews are not available, the uniform high rating suggests strong client satisfaction with the firm's legal support, particularly in commercial fishing, health and safety, and vessel transactions.

Clients praise Pitt & Moore for professional, friendly service and effective handling of immigration and property matters, with Geoff Caradus and the immigration team receiving specific commendation for responsiveness and expertise. However, several clients report excessive fees, with one alleging $100 for a single email and another describing costs exceeding $10,000 for visa work. Complaints also cite poor communication, lack of follow-up, and basic knowledge gaps in partners, leading some to switch firms.

Clients praise Michael Vesty for his skilled, reliable, and responsive service, noting his reasonable pricing and strong support. The reviews highlight his professionalism and quick response times, with no complaints or concerns mentioned.

Clients describe the firm as efficient, friendly, and providing top-notch advice. Positive reviews mention helpful lawyers like Jay. However, concerns include being labeled as 'rip off artists' and a complaint about an estate taking over 14 months to release funds.

Reviews are mixed with both positive and negative experiences. Some clients praise the lawyers as 'good', while others criticize the firm's handling of immigration matters, lack of experience, and failure to provide proper representation or evidence. One reviewer felt the firm advocated for the prosecution rather than the client.

Clients describe Rob as an outstanding lawyer who provides unwavering support throughout their legal situations. They particularly appreciate his dedication, time investment, and genuine care for their cases, with one reviewer expressing immense gratitude for his efforts. The single review reflects highly positive sentiment with no criticisms mentioned.

Reviews are mixed but skew positive. Clients praise the lawyers as very helpful and brilliant at their jobs, with one noting they protect clients from 'government bullies.' However, serious concerns emerge: multiple negative reviews mention poor service, lack of emotional intelligence, and a lawyer (Michael Vespa) who failed to appear in court for a minor cannabis possession case, resulting in an avoidable conviction. Another references Tony Bamford in 2015 news articles, implying historic issues. Overall, the firm seems capable but inconsistent, with some clients feeling let down.