Clients consistently praise Andrew Shaw for his expertise, empathy, and dedication, especially in complex family and guardianship disputes. Many highlight his clear communication, ability to achieve better-than-expected outcomes, and willingness to go above and beyond, including evening and weekend availability. While costs are noted, clients feel the fees are justified by the results.

Clients consistently praise the firm for exceptional service, responsiveness, and professionalism. Many highlight specific staff members like Niall, Connor, Kathy, Nicola, Robyn Dewson, and Violet for being friendly, efficient, and caring. Reviewers appreciate clear communication, off-street parking, and the team's ability to handle complex transactions smoothly. No negative feedback is noted.

Clients overwhelmingly praise Michael Ducray (and Jess) for being professional, friendly, and efficient, especially in property transactions. Many highlight his clear communication, thoroughness, and ability to make the process stress-free. One negative review criticizes a rude phone manner and refusal to give a fixed fee quote, but the vast majority express high satisfaction and strong recommendations.

Clients overwhelmingly describe McFadden McMeeken Phillips as having the 'best lawyers' with some noting the firm's wealth of knowledge in corporate law and ease of working with them. A single detailed negative review alleges corruption and illegal activity, specifically naming Nigel McFadden as dishonest and Alex Reith as untrustworthy, but another review dismisses this as inaccurate and motivated by a grudge. Overall, the reviews are positive but the one severe complaint stands out.

Clients consistently highlight the professionalism and expertise of Amanda Crehan and Jacintha Atkinson-Manson, praising their handling of complex estates, trusts, and property matters with compassion and clear communication. The team is described as friendly, efficient, and easy to contact, with specific appreciation for Gilly Bint's bubbly personality. No negative feedback or concerns are mentioned, and clients express complete confidence and willingness to return.

Clients praise the professional, efficient service and clear communication, highlighting solicitors Julie Aitken and Kirsty Goodall by name for their competence, genuine concern, and solutions-oriented approach. Reviews are consistently positive with no complaints mentioned.

Clients consistently praise the firm for being friendly, efficient, and accessible, with many highlighting Stephen Sansom and Rachael by name. Positive reviews emphasize excellent service in property conveyancing, wills, and estate planning, often noting long-term relationships. However, a repeated concern involves a data breach where personal details were sent to the wrong email, with no apology received, indicating a security issue.

Clients describe Pitt & Moore as helpful, professional, and efficient, with several praising clear explanations and excellent service, particularly for property matters and minor legal issues. One reviewer highlighted that they were not charged for a minor matter, while another highly recommended the firm, mentioning lawyer 'Kaye' by name. However, there is a serious complaint about delayed document processing (two months), overcharging, and failure to liaise with the client's bank, leading to a strongly negative review. Overall, most reviews are positive, but the single negative review raises concerns about consistency.

Clients praise the firm for professional, helpful, and efficient service, with specific commendations for lawyers like Geoff Caradus, Nick Mason, and others who provide clear guidance on immigration and property matters. However, many negative reviews highlight extremely high costs, excessive billing for minor tasks (e.g., $100 for a 'thank you' email), and a perceived lack of basic legal knowledge or follow-through, with some clients switching firms. Mixed experiences suggest that while some find value, others advise obtaining written quotes upfront and caution against the firm's pricing.

Clients describe the team as knowledgeable and reassuring, praising their ability to put people at ease during stressful legal matters. Overall sentiment is highly positive.

Clients praise Josh Friend and Steve as brilliant and excellent lawyers, noting they are genuine, supportive, and professional. However, multiple reviewers report extreme difficulty contacting the firm—left voicemails and emails go unanswered for months, and a court-appointed legal aid lawyer was unreachable. The receptionist is described as abrupt and unhelpful, and some feel the firm does not want new clients. The feedback is split between glowing endorsements and serious communication concerns.

Clients appreciate the efficient, friendly service and top-notch advice, with specific praise for lawyer Jay. However, there are serious concerns about high costs, delayed estate distributions, and a negative reputation, with complaints about waiting over 14 months for funds and being labeled 'rip off artists'.

Reviews reveal a stark contrast between clients who report slow, costly estate administration with frequent billing and those who appreciate friendly, professional service. Common complaints focus on delays, high charges, and poor communication during estate matters, while positive remarks highlight helpful reception staff and overall courteousness. No individual lawyers are specifically named in reviews.

Clients have mixed experiences at Glasgow Harley. Many praise Miro Booth and Brent McDonald for being clear, approachable, and efficient, especially in property and employment matters. Others commend Gerhard and his team for handling complex family and property transactions with empathy and professionalism. However, serious concerns are raised about Jeremy Glasgow's lack of empathy in a child-related family matter, and some clients report unprofessional conduct, poor communication, and perceived sexism in family law cases. Negative reviews also mention lawyers not following instructions or failing to explain processes.

Clients praise Rob Somerville for his dedication and support throughout their legal matters, highlighting his commitment to sticking with them until the end. They express deep gratitude for his time and effort, indicating a highly personalized and caring approach. The review emphasizes reliability and thoroughness in handling sensitive situations.

Clients often praise the firm's lawyers as helpful and knowledgeable, with some appreciating their advocacy for 'the little people' against government overreach. However, several reviews highlight serious concerns about poor service, lack of emotional intelligence, and mishandled cases, particularly naming Tony Bamford and Michael Vespa. One client reported that a lawyer failed to appear in court, leading to an unnecessary conviction, while another warned that clients end up in prison. Overall, the feedback is polarized, with both high praise and deeply critical reviews.