Clients consistently praise Andrew Shaw for his expertise, empathy, and dedication, especially in complex family and guardianship disputes. Many highlight his clear communication, ability to achieve better-than-expected outcomes, and willingness to go above and beyond, including evening and weekend availability. While costs are noted, clients feel the fees are justified by the results.

Clients consistently praise the firm for exceptional service, responsiveness, and professionalism. Many highlight specific staff members like Niall, Connor, Kathy, Nicola, Robyn Dewson, and Violet for being friendly, efficient, and caring. Reviewers appreciate clear communication, off-street parking, and the team's ability to handle complex transactions smoothly. No negative feedback is noted.

Clients consistently praise the team's excellent service, communication, and professionalism, with several reviews specifically naming Belinda Clarke for making house purchases stress-free and providing great information. Common themes include reasonable fees, a great team, and highly recommended service. No negative feedback was found.

Clients consistently praise Hall Law for their exceptional service, clear communication, and patient guidance, especially for first-home buyers. Belinda Clarke, Jo, Jessica, Amy, and Victoria Hall are frequently mentioned by name for their professionalism and ability to simplify complex processes. Reviews highlight stress-free transactions, reasonable fees, and responsiveness, with no negative feedback noted.

Clients consistently praise the firm for being professional, approachable, and excellent communicators. Specific lawyers like Alex, Paul, Laura, and Michelle are frequently mentioned for their knowledgeable and efficient service in business sales and property transactions. Clients highlight the firm's ability to navigate complex matters with ease and their empathetic, fair approach, making them highly recommended for commercial and property law.

Clients consistently praise Simon Penketh for being knowledgeable, efficient, and providing outstanding service, especially for first-home buyers and repeat clients. Many highlight his excellent communication and ability to make complex processes smooth. A unique positive mentioned is the optional presence of a friendly dog during meetings, adding a personal touch. No negative feedback is present.

Clients overwhelmingly describe McFadden McMeeken Phillips as having the 'best lawyers' with some noting the firm's wealth of knowledge in corporate law and ease of working with them. A single detailed negative review alleges corruption and illegal activity, specifically naming Nigel McFadden as dishonest and Alex Reith as untrustworthy, but another review dismisses this as inaccurate and motivated by a grudge. Overall, the reviews are positive but the one severe complaint stands out.

Clients consistently highlight the professionalism and expertise of Amanda Crehan and Jacintha Atkinson-Manson, praising their handling of complex estates, trusts, and property matters with compassion and clear communication. The team is described as friendly, efficient, and easy to contact, with specific appreciation for Gilly Bint's bubbly personality. No negative feedback or concerns are mentioned, and clients express complete confidence and willingness to return.

Clients praise the professional, efficient service and clear communication, highlighting solicitors Julie Aitken and Kirsty Goodall by name for their competence, genuine concern, and solutions-oriented approach. Reviews are consistently positive with no complaints mentioned.

Clients highly praise Margot Harkness and the team for being professional, friendly, and efficient, especially in property and family law matters. Positive reviews highlight clear communication, prompt service, and reasonable fees. However, there are significant concerns about unprofessionalism, including ignoring clients, not taking on new clients, and poor communication. Some clients felt discriminated against or received incorrect advice.

Clients consistently praise the firm for being friendly, efficient, and accessible, with many highlighting Stephen Sansom and Rachael by name. Positive reviews emphasize excellent service in property conveyancing, wills, and estate planning, often noting long-term relationships. However, a repeated concern involves a data breach where personal details were sent to the wrong email, with no apology received, indicating a security issue.

Clients describe Pitt & Moore as helpful, professional, and efficient, with several praising clear explanations and excellent service, particularly for property matters and minor legal issues. One reviewer highlighted that they were not charged for a minor matter, while another highly recommended the firm, mentioning lawyer 'Kaye' by name. However, there is a serious complaint about delayed document processing (two months), overcharging, and failure to liaise with the client's bank, leading to a strongly negative review. Overall, most reviews are positive, but the single negative review raises concerns about consistency.

Clients praise the firm's knowledgeable, friendly, and professional lawyers, with specific shout-outs to Ross. However, a recurring complaint about difficulty dealing with the firm appears in some reviews.

Clients describe the team as easy to deal with and results-driven. One reviewer noted that a lawyer (likely Luke Acland) effectively reduced a $50,000 fine to $4. Another simply said they were 'not impressed' but did not elaborate. Overall, reviews emphasize reliability and positive outcomes.

Clients consistently award the firm 5 stars, praising its expertise in maritime law and professional service. They highlight specific staff knowledge, particularly in maritime regulation and incidents. However, only two reviews exist, both identical, limiting insight into client experience.

Clients praise the firm for professional, helpful, and efficient service, with specific commendations for lawyers like Geoff Caradus, Nick Mason, and others who provide clear guidance on immigration and property matters. However, many negative reviews highlight extremely high costs, excessive billing for minor tasks (e.g., $100 for a 'thank you' email), and a perceived lack of basic legal knowledge or follow-through, with some clients switching firms. Mixed experiences suggest that while some find value, others advise obtaining written quotes upfront and caution against the firm's pricing.

Clients consistently praise Michael Vesty for his top-notch legal representation, describing him as skilled, reliable, and responsive. Reviewers highlight his fair pricing and dedication to clients, with specific mentions of his quick response time and impressive performance during their legal matters.

Clients appreciate the efficient, friendly service and top-notch advice, with specific praise for lawyer Jay. However, there are serious concerns about high costs, delayed estate distributions, and a negative reputation, with complaints about waiting over 14 months for funds and being labeled 'rip off artists'.

Clients have mixed experiences at Glasgow Harley. Many praise Miro Booth and Brent McDonald for being clear, approachable, and efficient, especially in property and employment matters. Others commend Gerhard and his team for handling complex family and property transactions with empathy and professionalism. However, serious concerns are raised about Jeremy Glasgow's lack of empathy in a child-related family matter, and some clients report unprofessional conduct, poor communication, and perceived sexism in family law cases. Negative reviews also mention lawyers not following instructions or failing to explain processes.

Clients have mixed experiences; some praise them as good lawyers, while others criticize poor immigration knowledge, lack of representation, and failure to provide evidence. Negative reviews mention unprofessional conduct and advocacy for prosecutors.

Clients praise Rob Somerville for his dedication and support throughout their legal matters, highlighting his commitment to sticking with them until the end. They express deep gratitude for his time and effort, indicating a highly personalized and caring approach. The review emphasizes reliability and thoroughness in handling sensitive situations.

Clients often praise the firm's lawyers as helpful and knowledgeable, with some appreciating their advocacy for 'the little people' against government overreach. However, several reviews highlight serious concerns about poor service, lack of emotional intelligence, and mishandled cases, particularly naming Tony Bamford and Michael Vespa. One client reported that a lawyer failed to appear in court, leading to an unnecessary conviction, while another warned that clients end up in prison. Overall, the feedback is polarized, with both high praise and deeply critical reviews.