Clients consistently praise Resolve Legal for their empathetic and supportive approach, especially during stressful employment issues. Multiple reviews highlight Viv's ability to relate personally to clients' situations, providing not just legal advice but also wellbeing support. The team is described as professional, excellent, and highly recommended, with timely and positive outcomes. A bonus mention of an office cat adds to the positive experience.

Clients consistently praise Phil Mitchell for his high skill, experience, and ability to achieve good outcomes in complex employment situations. Many highlight his professionalism, sharpness, and thoroughness, as well as his kindness and support during difficult times. A recurring theme is that while Phil is in high demand and sometimes takes longer to return communications, he is always timely and on point when it matters most. Clients also note his clear strategy and personable approach.

Clients praise Barbara Buckett as a fierce, relentless advocate with sharp strategy and genuine care, calling her the best employment lawyer in New Zealand. However, some criticize her for taking most of the settlement amount, slow communication, lack of inventive strategy, and high fees. Matt Belesky is also highly recommended, while negative reviews mention poor value and subpar service.

Clients highlight exceptional immigration law support during complex COVID-era policy changes, praising prompt, adaptive communication and clear guidance. The firm is lauded for professional, frank service that turned a lengthy visa journey into a successful outcome. Specific attorneys are commended for their savvy and proactive updates.

Clients consistently praise Peter McKenzie-Bridle for his professionalism, integrity, and sensitivity, especially in family and employment law matters. They highlight his realistic, down-to-earth approach and ability to reduce stress, even in difficult disputes. Specific mentions of his excellent advice, high-quality work, and positive outcomes are common. No negative themes emerge from the reviews.

Clients consistently praise the firm's professionalism, clear communication, and ability to simplify complex legal matters. Wendy Lindsay is frequently commended for her exceptional service, kindness, and efficiency in handling wills and estate planning. Reviews also highlight the team's thorough preparation, personalized advice, and expertise across property, employment, and family law. Overall, clients feel well-supported and confident in the firm's guidance.

Clients consistently praise Joanne Cheer for her no-nonsense, efficient, and professional approach in property transactions and family law matters. They highlight her clear communication, responsiveness, and ability to handle complex or contentious situations with calm and dignity. Reviewers emphasize feeling valued, receiving cost-effective services, and having strong trust in her expertise.

Clients consistently praise the firm's responsiveness, professionalism, and ability to handle high-pressure situations, with specific commendation for lawyers Laurie Pallett, Alan Knowsley, Andie Donnelly, and Thérèse Greenlees. Positive reviews highlight expertise in property transactions, mortgage refinancing, and dispute resolution, noting clear communication and dedicated support. One negative review criticizes high costs, tardiness, and lack of practical advice, suggesting the firm merely recites statutes without interpretation.

Clients consistently praise the firm for being responsive, communicative, and providing clear explanations in plain language. Specific lawyers like Alysha Hinton and Kate are commended for their efficient and pragmatic advice. One review noted a challenging season where the team's professional support was appreciated. However, one review rated the service as merely 'okay', indicating some variability.

Clients rave about the impeccable personal service and sound professional advice, describing the firm as 'lucky to have' and highly recommending it. The few reviews focus on quality and efficiency, with no negative feedback.

Clients consistently praise the firm for honest, transparent advice and cost-conscious approach. One reviewer highlighted Scott Balloch's clear guidance and practical tips that helped recover unpaid entitlements without unnecessary fees. Another review commended Caroline Rieger's knowledge and support during a difficult employment situation.

Clients report mixed experiences. Several praise individual lawyers like Georgia Vine for exceptional professionalism and support in property and family matters, with one describing life-changing outcomes. However, multiple clients criticize poor communication, billing issues, and slow responses, especially after initial positive interactions. A separation agreement client felt misled and overcharged, while others complain about weeks-long delays in follow-up.

Clients describe MinterEllisonRuddWatts as a top-tier New Zealand law firm, praising its highly knowledgeable, responsive, and professional service, particularly in tax and immigration. Specific commendations go to lawyer Rodney Craig for practical, pragmatic advice. Some note the high cost as a drawback, but overall sentiment is very positive, with one client calling it arguably NZ's top firm.

Clients consistently praise the firm for exceptional care, commitment, and professionalism, especially in difficult or personal cases. Johanna and the team are frequently mentioned for their patience, compassion, and tailored support, even during stressful situations like lockdown. Reviews highlight outstanding results and a client-focused approach, with one HR professional specifically recommending the firm for employment relations advice.

Clients consistently praise Collins & May Law for their professional, responsive, and caring service, particularly in property transactions. Amy Haste and Kirsten Collins receive specific commendations for making complex processes smooth and stress-free. Eugene Collins is lauded for long-term trusted advice across property, wills, and personal matters. However, one review strongly criticizes Amy Haste for being slow, unresponsive, and rude, nearly causing a lost property purchase, indicating a potential inconsistency in client experience.

Clients consistently praise the firm's exceptional customer service, clear communication, and efficient processes, especially in property transactions. Suné Hume and Arnaka Bright receive specific commendation for their helpfulness and clarity in conveyancing and wills. However, one client reports a negative experience with unreturned phone calls after multiple attempts, indicating occasional responsiveness issues.

Clients praise the firm's immigration law expertise, with one reviewer highlighting that David and Richard were knowledgeable, clear, helpful, and human after two previous firms provided only waffle. The client successfully obtained a visa thanks to their work.

Client reviews are largely positive, praising the team's professionalism, clear communication, and caring approach, which made stressful processes manageable. However, a detailed one-star review from an investigative journalist accuses partner Andrew Davies of sending a letter with false assumptions and racially charged accusations, causing significant reputational concern. Another negative review highlights poor phone service, making the reviewer feel like a burden.

Reviews are mixed but limited: one positive response from the firm itself defending against a negative review, and one negative review citing immorality and dishonesty. The firm's response highlights a legal victory against a reviewer who refused to pay, showcasing integrity in advising the client to stay with existing lawyers. The negative review lacks detail but strongly warns against hiring.

Clients describe Ismail Rasheed as an excellent immigration lawyer who provides professional, experienced, and efficient service. They praise his ability to handle complex cases, respond to PPI letters, and secure positive outcomes such as residency approvals. The firm is appreciated for giving free initial advice and clear guidance, with no negative comments or concerns raised.

Clients highlight Tim Vogel's integrity, honesty, and follow-through, describing him as amazing and deeply appreciative of his support throughout the process. Reviews emphasize professional and helpful service, with no negative feedback noted.

One long-term client highly praises Daryl Strachan's ethical, professional, and straight-talking approach over 25 years, emphasizing his kindness and understanding. Another reviewer harshly criticizes the service as pathetic and unprofessional, calling for investigation and warning others to avoid. The reviews are extremely polarized, with one outstanding and one severe complaint.

Client reviews present a sharply divided experience. Some clients praise the firm as 'fantastic to deal with at every level,' while others allege significant hidden charges, with complaints of being billed $920 for an initial meeting and email, or $600 for a half-hour consultation due to unexpected supervisor and stationery fees.

Clients consistently praise lawyers Lagi Tuimavave and Harriet Hughes for their professionalism, kindness, and cultural sensitivity. Lagi is highlighted for excellent communication, prompt responses, and clear explanations of legal processes, especially in domestic violence cases. Harriet is commended for her non-judgmental and supportive approach during stressful court proceedings. Overall, clients appreciate the firm's understanding, helpfulness, and the ability to call on experienced partners when needed.

Clients consistently praise the firm for its friendly, professional service and clear communication. Shane and Mark are mentioned for their helpful, plain-English approach, while Brenda is noted for efficiency. The office atmosphere is described as bright, spacious, and welcoming. A minor accessibility issue is noted due to a staircase.

Clients describe Christina Leech as highly effective and experienced, particularly in family law, with a strong reputation for obtaining results. Reviewers consistently recommend her professional service, though one review is ambiguous and unrelated to legal services.

Clients frequently praise the firm's fast, professional, and knowledgeable service, particularly highlighting Andrea Coop's expertise in property law and her approachable manner. One reviewer credits the firm with saving their life, emphasizing their efficiency. However, a single review reports rude treatment from the front desk and office manager, creating a contrast in client experiences.

Clients consistently praise Gordon for his professionalism, clear communication, and accessibility. Multiple reviews highlight his patience in explaining matters thoroughly, his sense of humor, and his straightforward approach. Clients appreciate that he is not overly greedy with fees and has been trusted for over a decade.

Clients consistently praise the firm for its professional, friendly, and efficient service, particularly in immigration and employment matters. Lawyers Jordan and Paul are singled out for their helpfulness, accessibility, and ability to achieve positive outcomes. Reviewers highlight the firm's quick resolution of issues and supportive approach during stressful times.

One client praised the firm for being professional, keeping them well-informed, offering reasonable fees, and achieving desired results. However, another client described the lawyer as rude and impolite.

Clients describe the service as helpful and excellent, with one noting consistent support. However, a significant concern is a lack of response to an enquiry, indicating potential communication gaps.

Clients praise Oakley Moran for their quick and efficient service, especially in urgent situations like drawing up EPOAs for a hospitalized family member. Anthea is specifically commended for her helpful advice and positive attitude. The firm is recommended for estate planning matters.

Clients praise Chris Nicholls Law for its willingness to help even those they don't know, with one reviewer noting assistance in court against a problematic security guard. The firm is described as great, suggesting strong support and professionalism.

Clients appreciate the firm's quick response time, as highlighted in a 5-star review.

Clients commend Anna and the team for their grace, patience, and availability during urgent situations. They appreciate the customized service and attention to individual needs, especially during difficult times. The firm is highly recommended with exceptional satisfaction expressed.

Clients describe the firm as very professional and praise the prompt service from Luke.

Clients consistently praise the excellent service and friendly staff, highlighting a positive overall experience. Reviews are brief but overwhelmingly positive, with no negative feedback mentioned.

Clients are divided: one reports rude and rushed service, while another praises excellent support. The negative review highlights poor communication and lack of willingness to help, whereas the positive review is brief but enthusiastic.

Clients have mixed experiences: one praises the property lawyer for being honest and meticulous, another appreciates good legal advice, but two negative reviews highlight excessive fees, lack of upfront engagement terms, and poor communication and service from Michael Varuhas in an unresolved case.

Reviews are mixed, with strong polarity. Multiple clients accuse John Porter of fraud, alleging he charged $23,000 for an impossible appeal and ignored complaints, prompting a Law Society referral. In contrast, other clients praise John Porter and the staff for excellent, professional service on property and other matters, noting reasonable fees and responsiveness.

Clients praise Vicki and Fiona for being supportive, knowledgeable, and effective in difficult family court cases, especially for parents seeking custody. Positive reviews highlight their empathy, clear communication, and successful outcomes over years. However, negative reviews accuse Vicki of poor communication, lack of care, and failing to advocate, costing one parent time with their children. A few clients feel misled by initial promises and left to fend for themselves.

Clients are divided: some praise John Dean as honest and cost-effective, while others report severe negligence, lack of communication, and lost cases. One client describes being given inadequate notice for a court date and ignored when trying to reschedule. Another calls the lawyer a disgrace.

Clients report that the firm's address is incorrect, specifically noting that it is no longer located near Queensgate Countdown in Lower Hutt, causing confusion.