Clients consistently praise the team for being professional, empathetic, and supportive, especially during stressful employment issues. Viv is frequently mentioned for her relatable advice and understanding of client wellbeing. Specific lawyers like Max and Matt are commended for their communication and excellent guidance. The presence of a cat is noted as an added bonus.

Clients consistently praise Phil Mitchell for his exceptional legal expertise, strategic thinking, and ability to achieve excellent outcomes in employment matters. Many highlight his kindness, professionalism, and supportive approach during stressful situations. While demand is high and responses can sometimes be delayed, clients emphasize that communication is always timely when it matters most.

Clients consistently praise the firm's professionalism, expertise, and clear communication, particularly in property, immigration, and business law. Reviewers highlight specific lawyers like Vikram Singh for immigration success and Jana Havler for property portfolio restructuring, noting their patience, dedication, and ability to simplify complex processes. No negative feedback was mentioned.

Clients commend Barbara Buckett for being fierce, relentless, and highly effective in fighting for her clients, with one calling her the best employment lawyer in New Zealand. However, negative reviews criticize her for taking most of a small settlement, slow communication, and lack of creative strategy. Matt Belesky also receives praise. Overall, there is strong loyalty from some clients but significant dissatisfaction from others.

Clients describe Lane Neave as providing exceptional professional service, particularly in immigration law. Reviewers praise the firm's clear and frank communication, adaptability during COVID-19 policy changes, and effective handling of complex cases from visitor visas to permanent residency. Specific lawyers like Tamsin and Andy are mentioned for their outstanding work. The overall sentiment is highly positive, with clients recommending the firm without hesitation.

Clients consistently praise Peter McKenzie-Bridle for his professionalism, sensitivity, and integrity. He is described as down-to-earth, realistic, and excellent at dispute resolution, employment law, and family court matters. One client noted his ability to handle a difficult dispute that a previous lawyer found too challenging, resulting in a positive outcome. No negative themes were mentioned.

Clients consistently praise the professionalism and clarity of Hayman Lawyers, with Wendy Lindsay and John Evans frequently mentioned for their expert advice and efficient service. Reviews highlight the firm's ability to simplify complex legal matters, especially in wills, property, and employment law. The team is described as approachable, quick to respond, and focused on client needs. No negative feedback was provided.

Clients repeatedly praise Joanne Cheer for her no-nonsense, efficient, and personable service in property, wills, and family law matters. They highlight her professionalism, clear communication, calm handling of contentious situations, and affordable costs. Trust and value for money are common themes, with multiple clients recommending her without hesitation.

Clients consistently praise Duncan Cotterill for their clear communication, responsiveness, and professional support. Many highlight specific lawyers like Alysha Hinton and Kate for efficient and pragmatic advice. One review notes improved experience after previous poor service, while a single review rates service as merely okay.

Clients highly praise partners Laurie Pallett and Alan Knowsley for their exceptional legal guidance, responsiveness, and ability to handle high-pressure situations, particularly in property and dispute resolution matters. Laurie is specifically commended for managing complex mortgage refinance and property sale issues, while Alan is recognized for clear communication and dedication. One negative review criticizes the firm for high costs, delays, and lack of legal interpretation, suggesting the service does not add value beyond publicly available statutes.

Clients consistently praise the firm for excellent service, professionalism, and clear communication. Amanda Gaffey is frequently mentioned for her calm, thorough, and efficient handling of property transactions. Conor Lennon is commended for making will and power of attorney processes easy and understandable. However, one negative review criticizes the firm for holding onto funds and charging administration fees in deceased estate work.

Clients rave about the impeccable personal service and sound professional advice, with one calling the firm 'lucky to have' and highly recommending it. Another simply describes it as good service. Overall, reviews are very positive, highlighting a helpful and reliable experience.

Clients praise the firm's knowledgeable and supportive lawyers, particularly Caro and Scott, who provide honest, clear advice and practical tips. One client highlighted Scott's integrity in not inflating fees and helping them recover a substantial amount owed. The firm is highly recommended for messy employment situations, with emphasis on cost-consciousness and high-quality legal guidance.

Clients consistently praise MinterEllisonRuddWatts for high-quality, professional, and commercially astute legal advice. Specific mentions include Rodney Craig for practical, pragmatic counsel and the firm's expertise in tax and immigration. While premium pricing is noted as a drawback, the firm is widely regarded as one of New Zealand's top law firms. Reviewers also highlight the firm's impressive offices and knowledgeable people.

Clients praise specific lawyers like Georgia Vine for exceptional professionalism and clear communication in property matters, with one client expressing deep gratitude for family support. However, multiple negative reviews highlight severe issues: a client faced a year-long delay and $3000 in fees with no progress on an amicable separation agreement, including misinformation and unresponsive communication. Another client reported a month-long wait for a response after a positive initial experience, causing stress. Overall, the firm shows a stark contrast between highly satisfactory personalized service and unacceptable delays, unresponsiveness, and billing issues.

Clients consistently praise Main Street Legal for exceptional service in property conveyancing, highlighting lawyers Suné Hume and Arnaka Bright for clear communication, efficiency, and helpful guidance through first-home purchases and wills. One reviewer noted the firm excels at explaining legalese in layman's terms and providing 'best customer service practices.' However, a negative review reports poor responsiveness, with calls not returned after multiple attempts, suggesting occasional lapses in communication.

Clients consistently praise the exceptional care, commitment, and professionalism of the team, particularly Johanna and Steph, who provide patient, tailored support during difficult and complex cases. Reviewers highlight the firm's compassion and ability to achieve outstanding positive results, with one HR professional stating they would exclusively use this firm for employment relations advice. Feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with no complaints noted beyond a neutral comment about office aesthetics.

Clients consistently praise the firm's professional, responsive, and thorough property services, with particular commendation for Amy Haste and Kirsten Collins for making the purchase process smooth and clear. Eugene Collins receives long-standing loyalty for his advice on property, wills, and personal safety. However, one critical review describes Amy as slow, unresponsive, and rude, nearly costing a property purchase. The firm is also noted for being family-friendly with reasonable costs and flexible payment options.

Clients praise the firm's immigration expertise, particularly highlighting David and Richard for their clear, knowledgeable, and compassionate guidance after two previous firms failed to provide satisfactory advice. The review emphasizes successful visa outcomes and a human touch.

Clients praise Treadwells for professional, caring, and knowledgeable service, with clear communication making stressful processes manageable. However, one review strongly criticizes partner Andrew Davie for sending a letter with false assumptions and racially charged accusations, which the reviewer found unprofessional and damaging. Another client reported poor phone service, feeling like a burden rather than a valued client.

There are very few client reviews. One positive review is actually a response from the firm defending against a negative review, where the firm notes a Disputes Tribunal found the reviewer's comments unjustified and praised a lawyer's integrity. A single one-star review accuses the firm of immoral and dishonest behavior, but lacks specific details.

Clients consistently praise Ismail Rasheed for his expertise in immigration law, noting his professionalism, experience, and ability to handle complex cases such as PPI letters and residency applications. They highlight his detailed preparation, strategic approach, and responsiveness to deadlines, with one client specifically thanking him for free advice. No negative feedback appears in the reviews.

Clients highlight Daryl Strachan's ethical integrity, professionalism, and clear communication, with one describing him as a straight talker who understands client intentions. However, another client complains of unprofessional service and suggests a lack of conduct, indicating mixed experiences.

Clients describe a highly positive experience, highlighting Tim Vogel's integrity, honesty, and thorough support throughout the process. They feel guided and grateful for his professionalism and helpfulness. No negative reviews were found.

A negative review describes hidden charges, with a client being billed $600 for a half-hour consultation including supervisor and stationary fees, far exceeding the quoted $220 hourly rate. Another reviewer called the firm a 'rip off merchant', citing $920 for an initial meeting and one email. A positive review praises the team as 'fantastic to deal with at every level', but the overall sentiment is negative due to billing complaints.

Clients rave about the exceptional service from lawyers Lagi Tuimavave and Harriet Hughes, highlighting their clear communication, cultural sensitivity, and compassionate, non-judgmental approach. Reviewers feel supported and informed throughout their cases, with particular praise for prompt responses and client-centered advocacy. The firm is consistently described as professional, understanding, and helpful, with the backing of experienced partners.

Clients consistently praise the firm for friendly, professional service and clear communication. Shane, Mark, and Brenda are individually commended for helping with property and family matters, with Mark described as a plain-speaking family man offering reasonable prices. One review notes the office is accessible via stairs but spacious and bright inside. Overall, clients appreciate the helpfulness, efficiency, and long-standing relationship with the firm.

Clients consistently describe Christina Leech as highly professional and effective, with several noting excellent results in family law matters. One reviewer called her 'one of the most experienced family lawyers in Porirua' with a strong reputation for obtaining results. A single 3-star review is a stray comment about a shop, likely not related to the law firm. Overall, clients trust her to get the job done and recommend her services.

Clients are very impressed with Andrea Coop's expertise in property matters, describing her as knowledgeable and nice. Others highlight the firm's fast and professional service, with one client saying they 'saved my life.' However, a negative review mentions rude staff at the front desk and office manager, indicating inconsistency in client service.

Clients describe Gordon as great, easy to talk to, patient, and clear in explanations. They highlight his availability, sense of humor, and straightforward, non-greedy approach. Long-term clients praise his consistent quality over many years.

Clients consistently praise the firm's professionalism, accessibility, and effectiveness. Specific lawyers Jordan and Paul are frequently commended for their expertise in immigration and workplace issues, with clients noting fast, effective results and a supportive team environment. All reviews are 5-star with no negative feedback.

Clients highlight Blake's professionalism, clear communication, and reasonable fees. One client felt well-informed and guided through the legal process, achieving desired results. However, a single negative review mentions rude and impolite behavior, indicating potential inconsistency in client service.

Clients highlight the firm's helpfulness and excellent service in some reviews, while one client reports a lack of response to an enquiry, indicating inconsistency in communication.

Clients appreciate the lawyer's willingness to help them in court, even without prior acquaintance, and his competence in dealing with difficult court room situations involving bias. The individual review highlights his effectiveness against an unruly security guard.

Clients highlight Anthea's quick and efficient handling of urgent EPOA matters, praising her helpful advice and positive attitude. The firm is recommended for responsive service and clear communication during stressful situations.

Clients appreciate the quick response time from the firm, with one review highlighting the great response experience.

Clients express deep gratitude for the team's grace and patience, especially during urgent and difficult times. One reviewer highlights that service was available the very next day and customized to suit their needs, recommending the firm to others.

Clients praise Luke for his professional and prompt service, highlighting a positive experience with efficiency and expertise. The single review reflects high satisfaction with the firm's responsiveness.

Clients describe the service as excellent and the staff as friendly, emphasizing a positive overall experience. The review highlights the team's professionalism and approachability.

Clients report mixed experiences. One client described the lawyer as rude and rushed, wanting to end the call quickly, while another praised the wonderful support received. The positive review highlights a supportive and helpful interaction.

Clients have mixed experiences with Costa Varuhas & Co. Some praise Costa himself as honest, meticulous, and good for property matters, while others criticize Michael Varuhas for unreliability, poor communication, and slow progress on cases. A serious concern is a client who found fees extraordinarily high and was not provided with a contract or terms of engagement upfront. Overall, feedback is polarized: positive reviews highlight Costa's competence, while negative reviews warn about high costs and poor service from Michael.

Reviews are sharply divided: some clients call John Porter a 'crook' and accuse him of charging $23,000 for an appeal that was legally impossible, while others praise his service, professionalism, and reasonable fees, especially for property matters. The negative reviews express anger over billing and lack of communication, while the positive ones highlight responsiveness and great advice.

Clients highly praise Vicki and Fiona for their deep knowledge, support, and advocacy in difficult family court cases, with several noting they successfully secured full custody. However, there are serious concerns about Vicki's lack of communication, empathy, and transparency from a few clients who felt misled and abandoned, leading to negative outcomes.

Reviews are mixed but lean negative. One client highly praises John Dean as honest, dependable, and cost-effective. However, two other clients report severe dissatisfaction: one describes neglected cases, lost outcomes, poor communication, and a lawyer who failed to advocate in court, while another calls the firm a disgrace.

A single Google review indicates a client found the address incorrect, noting that the firm is no longer located near Queensgate Countdown in Lower Hutt. This raises a concern about outdated location information.