Andrea Simpson-Keene posted a response on behalf of the firm, claiming that a negative review was unjustified and referencing a Disputes Tribunal decision in their favor. The firm stated they have not acted for the other reviewer. One client issued a scathing 1-star review, alleging immoral and dishonest conduct, and warned others to avoid the firm.
Generated from 2 Google reviews and NZ Law Society data
4 team members
Legal Executive
Special Counsel
Principal
Receptionist
Bartlett Law’s response to reviews from Aotearoa and Eve Leniston-Howell (Posted by Andrea Simpson-Keene, Business Manager, Bartlett law) “Aotearoa”’s non-payment of Bartlett Law’s account is the subject of a Disputes Tribunal decision in Bartlett Law’s favour. “Aotearoa” has been ordered to pay the firm $1081.12 by 19 June 2019. As at the time of posting this response, this amount has not been paid. The Disputes Tribunal also said: “I note [name – lawyer at Bartlett Law]’s integrity in advising “Aotearoa” to remain with [his/her] existing lawyers, which I have little doubt saved “Aotearoa” a considerable amount of money. “Aotearoa” may now wish to demonstrate equal integrity, by removing the comments that [he/she] placed on Bartlett Law’s website [actually Google reviews]: those comments are clearly unjustified.” “Aotearoa” has failed to do this. Bartlett Law has not acted for anyone named Eve Leniston-Howell.
Can you give zero stars!? In my opinion this is a firm you should avoid. They have acted in a way that find to me immoral and dishonest. I stand by my review of this firm.
Tell us what you need and we'll match you with the best Wellington lawyer for your situation — free.
Ready to discuss your legal needs? Reach out directly.