Clients consistently describe Phil Mitchell as a highly skilled, sharp, and personable lawyer who achieves excellent outcomes in employment matters. They highlight his kindness and support during difficult times, as well as his ability to provide clear strategy and timely communication when it matters most. While a few clients note that his services are in high demand and responses can sometimes be delayed, he is praised for being on point when crucial. Overall, clients have the highest regard for his expertise and recommend him without hesitation.

Clients consistently praise the firm for being approachable, efficient, and helpful. Specific lawyers like Hamish and Eoin are commended for their professional service and clear communication, especially in conveyancing and family law. Reviews highlight a positive client experience with reasonable pricing and a personal touch.

Clients describe the firm as fast, efficient, and professional, with one reviewer highlighting outstanding results. The service is praised for being top-notch, though feedback is limited with only two reviews. One client simply noted 'Good', indicating satisfactory but not exceptional experience.

Clients highly praise the conveyancing team, especially Suné Hume, Arnaka Bright, and Marion, for clear communication, efficient service, and excellent customer care. One reviewer highlights the firm's ability to explain legalese in layman's terms and provide 'best customer service practices.' However, a single negative review reports poor responsiveness, with calls not returned within several days, leading to a recommendation against the firm.

Clients describe the firm as informative and friendly, with one review giving a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights a positive client experience with professional and approachable staff.

Clients describe Paterson Anderson as fantastic, diligent, and communicative, with experienced lawyers who go above and beyond. One reviewer noted a smooth transition when a lawyer went on maternity leave. Feedback suggests the firm could create an introductory guide on managing client expectations about lawyer availability and process.

Clients praise Treadwells for professional, clear, and caring service, highlighting prompt responses and excellent results. However, one review severely criticizes Andrew Davie for sending a letter with false assumptions and racial insinuations, calling the conduct unprofessional and planning a formal complaint. Another complaint mentions poor phone service where a potential client felt像 a burden.

Clients consistently praise Ismail Rasheed for his expertise, professionalism, and ability to handle complex immigration cases efficiently. Reviews highlight his personalized approach, clear communication, and successful outcomes, including permanent residency approvals. One client specifically notes his responsiveness to PPI letters and strategic guidance, while another appreciates receiving free initial advice.

Clients frequently praise Melanie Baker for her reliable service and Sean Clarke for his exceptional communication and dedication, especially in difficult cases. However, a negative review criticizes a lawyer (name starting with S) for poor communication and abandoning a client on a court date without notice. Overall, clients recommend the firm for its caring approach and effective handling of legal matters.

Clients highly praise solicitors Alex Nicoloff and Hamish Cameron for property and business matters, noting their professionalism, knowledge, and support. However, multiple reviewers criticize Hamish for being rude, unresponsive, and lacking empathy, with serious concerns about poor communication and irresponsible conduct.

Clients report mixed experiences, with some criticizing high and unexpected costs, describing the firm as a 'rip off merchant' and complaining about hidden charges. One client was charged $600 for a half-hour consultation due to supervisor and stationary fees, another paid $920 for one meeting and an email. However, a positive review states the firm was 'nothing but fantastic to deal with at every level of the business.'

Clients praise the firm for its empathetic, non-judgmental approach, especially under the stress of family court proceedings. Lagi Tuimavave and Harriet Hughes are singled out for their professionalism, cultural sensitivity, clear communication, and prompt responses. One client notes that Lagi actively kept them informed and explained formalities before court, while another appreciates access to more experienced partners when needed. Overall, reviewers feel supported and recommend the firm highly for domestic violence and family law matters.

Clients highly recommend Christina Leech for her effectiveness and professionalism, noting that she gets results, especially in family law. One review mentions her as one of the most experienced family lawyers in Porirua. A single 3-star review appears to be an unrelated comment about a shop. Overall, the feedback is very positive with strong praise for her service and outcomes.

Clients consistently praise the firm for its professional, friendly service and clear communication, with specific mentions of lawyers Shane, Mark, and legal executive Brenda. Multiple reviews highlight long-term loyalty and appreciation for family-oriented, practical advice. Accessibility is noted as requiring stairs but the office itself is described as bright and spacious.

Clients praise the firm for its fast, professional service and expertise in property law, with Andrea Coop specifically noted for her knowledge and nice demeanor. However, one reviewer strongly criticizes the front desk and office manager for rude and disrespectful behavior, which stands out as a concerning issue.

Clients highlight Gordon as approachable, responsive, and transparent, with clear communication and reasonable fees. Long-term clients praise his patience and ability to explain complex issues simply. The firm is highly regarded for its straightforward, client-focused service.

Clients consistently praise the firm for its professionalism, efficiency, and friendly service. Specific lawyers like Paul and Jordan are commended for their expert assistance with immigration matters, including work visas. The team is described as always available to answer questions and resolve issues, making stressful situations easier. Overall, reviewers highly recommend Paul Cheng & Co for their effective and timely legal help.

Clients generally praise Blake Dawson for being professional, guiding them through legal processes, and achieving desired results. One review specifically highlights reasonable fees and clear communication from the start. However, there is a negative review citing rude and impolite behavior. Overall, the positive feedback strongly outweighs the negative.

Clients appreciate the helpful and excellent service provided, with multiple reviewers giving 5/5 stars for being very helpful. However, one client expressed dissatisfaction due to receiving no reply to their enquiry.

Clients highlight the lawyer's willingness to help someone without prior acquaintance, stepping in to provide court representation against a difficult opponent. The review praises the firm for assisting with an urgent court appearance and commends the lawyer's character in a challenging situation involving a security guard.

Clients praise the firm's responsiveness and efficiency, especially for urgent matters like EPOAs for a hospitalised family member. Anthea is specifically commended for her helpful advice and positive attitude. The reviews highlight a quick turnaround and a client-focused approach.

Clients highlight the firm's quick response times, with one review specifically praising the great response time. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, though limited in number.

Clients praise Anna and the team for their grace, patience, and urgent availability during difficult times. They appreciate customized service and strong personal recommendations. The only review highlights exceptional emotional support and responsiveness.

Clients describe the firm as professional and prompt, with Luke specifically mentioned for delivering efficient service. Reviews reflect a positive client experience with a focus on reliability and professionalism.

Clients describe the service as excellent and the staff as friendly, highlighting a positive experience.

Clients report mixed experiences. One client felt the lawyer was rude and rushed, while another praised the support received. The positive review highlights helpfulness, but the negative review indicates poor communication and attitude.

Clients have mixed experiences with this firm. Some praise Costa as honest, meticulous, and a good choice for property law, while others complain about very high fees, lack of transparency on costs, poor communication, and unreliable service, specifically naming Michael Varuhas as providing poor service and leaving a case unresolved.

Clients are sharply divided. Several reviews warn that John Porter is a 'conman' and 'crook' who charged a $23,000 deposit for an appeal that was legally impossible, then billed the full amount and ignored complaints. Others praise John Porter as professional, responsive, and helpful, especially for property transactions and general legal advice.

Clients frequently praise Vicki and Fiona for their unwavering support and expertise in difficult family court cases, with several highlighting successful outcomes for custody and day-to-day care. Positive reviewers emphasize Vicki's knowledge, empathy, and clear communication. However, criticisms focus on poor communication, lack of advocacy, and perceived lack of care from Vicki, with some clients feeling misled and considering switching lawyers. The firm appears to elicit strong reactions, with both high praise and significant dissatisfaction.

Clients report mixed experiences. One client praised John Dean as honest, dependable, and cost-effective. However, multiple reviews express extreme dissatisfaction, alleging neglect, poor communication, and unfavorable case outcomes. One reviewer detailed being given inadequate court notice and a lack of support during proceedings.

Only one review available, which is very negative. The client complains that the firm's address is incorrect, specifically referencing a location near Queensgate Countdown in Lower Hutt. No positive aspects or lawyer names are mentioned.