Clients consistently praise Phil Mitchell for his high skill, experience, and ability to achieve good outcomes in complex employment situations. Many highlight his professionalism, sharpness, and thoroughness, as well as his kindness and support during difficult times. A recurring theme is that while Phil is in high demand and sometimes takes longer to return communications, he is always timely and on point when it matters most. Clients also note his clear strategy and personable approach.

Clients consistently highlight the professionalism, approachability, and efficiency of Cameron Lawyers. Specific praise is given to Hamish for first-home conveyancing, making the process comfortable and streamlined, and to Eoin for great advice and reasonable pricing. The team is described as helpful, fantastic, and efficient, with no negative feedback reported.

Clients describe the firm as fast, efficient, and professional, with one noting 'outstanding results.' Another reviewer gave a brief 'good' rating, indicating a generally positive but less detailed experience. Overall, feedback highlights efficiency, professionalism, and successful outcomes.

Clients consistently praise the firm's exceptional customer service, clear communication, and efficient processes, especially in property transactions. Suné Hume and Arnaka Bright receive specific commendation for their helpfulness and clarity in conveyancing and wills. However, one client reports a negative experience with unreturned phone calls after multiple attempts, indicating occasional responsiveness issues.

Clients praise the firm for being fantastic, diligent, communicative, and experienced, noting that the service went above and beyond compared to a previous firm. A smooth lawyer transition during maternity leave was highlighted as a positive. The one piece of feedback was to better set client expectations around lawyer availability and processes.

Clients describe the firm as informative and friendly, with one reviewer highlighting a positive experience. The single review conveys satisfaction with the service provided, though no specific details or names are mentioned.

Client reviews are largely positive, praising the team's professionalism, clear communication, and caring approach, which made stressful processes manageable. However, a detailed one-star review from an investigative journalist accuses partner Andrew Davies of sending a letter with false assumptions and racially charged accusations, causing significant reputational concern. Another negative review highlights poor phone service, making the reviewer feel like a burden.

Clients describe Ismail Rasheed as an excellent immigration lawyer who provides professional, experienced, and efficient service. They praise his ability to handle complex cases, respond to PPI letters, and secure positive outcomes such as residency approvals. The firm is appreciated for giving free initial advice and clear guidance, with no negative comments or concerns raised.

Clients praise Sean Clarke for being incredible, understanding, and great at communication during a complex situation, with one client highly recommending him. Another reviewer had a negative experience with a lawyer whose name starts with S, citing poor communication and stress, and was advised to find another lawyer. Multiple clients highly recommend the firm, with Melanie Baker specifically noted for looking after clients. Overall, the firm receives strong positive feedback, though a few mention communication issues.

Clients praise Alex Nicoloff for her exceptional professionalism, clear communication, and stress-free handling of property purchases, calling her approachable and responsive. However, multiple negative reviews criticize Hamish Cameron for being rude, patronizing, unresponsive, and lacking empathy, with clients warning against trusting him with important matters. While some clients have had positive experiences with Hamish on property and business matters, the firm's overall reputation is mixed due to starkly contrasting experiences with different solicitors.

Clients praise Cuba Family Law for its empathetic, conciliatory approach to family court matters, with multiple reviewers highlighting Bridie Henderson and Deenie Roche as exceptional lawyers who provide clear, compassionate communication and expert advocacy. However, two negative reviews mention experiences of intimidation, pressure, and lack of sensitivity, one criticizing the firm's handling of a family harm matter and another singling out Patricia Chin for poor attitude and slow work. Overall, the firm is recognized for its professionalism and client-centered service, but concerns about sensitivity in domestic violence cases exist.

Client reviews present a sharply divided experience. Some clients praise the firm as 'fantastic to deal with at every level,' while others allege significant hidden charges, with complaints of being billed $920 for an initial meeting and email, or $600 for a half-hour consultation due to unexpected supervisor and stationery fees.

Clients consistently praise lawyers Lagi Tuimavave and Harriet Hughes for their professionalism, kindness, and cultural sensitivity. Lagi is highlighted for excellent communication, prompt responses, and clear explanations of legal processes, especially in domestic violence cases. Harriet is commended for her non-judgmental and supportive approach during stressful court proceedings. Overall, clients appreciate the firm's understanding, helpfulness, and the ability to call on experienced partners when needed.

Clients consistently praise the firm for its friendly, professional service and clear communication. Shane and Mark are mentioned for their helpful, plain-English approach, while Brenda is noted for efficiency. The office atmosphere is described as bright, spacious, and welcoming. A minor accessibility issue is noted due to a staircase.

Clients describe Christina Leech as highly effective and experienced, particularly in family law, with a strong reputation for obtaining results. Reviewers consistently recommend her professional service, though one review is ambiguous and unrelated to legal services.

Clients frequently praise the firm's fast, professional, and knowledgeable service, particularly highlighting Andrea Coop's expertise in property law and her approachable manner. One reviewer credits the firm with saving their life, emphasizing their efficiency. However, a single review reports rude treatment from the front desk and office manager, creating a contrast in client experiences.

Clients consistently praise Gordon for his professionalism, clear communication, and accessibility. Multiple reviews highlight his patience in explaining matters thoroughly, his sense of humor, and his straightforward approach. Clients appreciate that he is not overly greedy with fees and has been trusted for over a decade.

Clients consistently praise the firm for its professional, friendly, and efficient service, particularly in immigration and employment matters. Lawyers Jordan and Paul are singled out for their helpfulness, accessibility, and ability to achieve positive outcomes. Reviewers highlight the firm's quick resolution of issues and supportive approach during stressful times.

One client praised the firm for being professional, keeping them well-informed, offering reasonable fees, and achieving desired results. However, another client described the lawyer as rude and impolite.

Clients describe the service as helpful and excellent, with one noting consistent support. However, a significant concern is a lack of response to an enquiry, indicating potential communication gaps.

Clients praise Oakley Moran for their quick and efficient service, especially in urgent situations like drawing up EPOAs for a hospitalized family member. Anthea is specifically commended for her helpful advice and positive attitude. The firm is recommended for estate planning matters.

Clients praise Chris Nicholls Law for its willingness to help even those they don't know, with one reviewer noting assistance in court against a problematic security guard. The firm is described as great, suggesting strong support and professionalism.

Clients appreciate the firm's quick response time, as highlighted in a 5-star review.

Clients commend Anna and the team for their grace, patience, and availability during urgent situations. They appreciate the customized service and attention to individual needs, especially during difficult times. The firm is highly recommended with exceptional satisfaction expressed.

Clients describe the firm as very professional and praise the prompt service from Luke.

Clients consistently praise the excellent service and friendly staff, highlighting a positive overall experience. Reviews are brief but overwhelmingly positive, with no negative feedback mentioned.

Clients are divided: one reports rude and rushed service, while another praises excellent support. The negative review highlights poor communication and lack of willingness to help, whereas the positive review is brief but enthusiastic.

Clients have mixed experiences: one praises the property lawyer for being honest and meticulous, another appreciates good legal advice, but two negative reviews highlight excessive fees, lack of upfront engagement terms, and poor communication and service from Michael Varuhas in an unresolved case.

Reviews are mixed, with strong polarity. Multiple clients accuse John Porter of fraud, alleging he charged $23,000 for an impossible appeal and ignored complaints, prompting a Law Society referral. In contrast, other clients praise John Porter and the staff for excellent, professional service on property and other matters, noting reasonable fees and responsiveness.

Clients praise Vicki and Fiona for being supportive, knowledgeable, and effective in difficult family court cases, especially for parents seeking custody. Positive reviews highlight their empathy, clear communication, and successful outcomes over years. However, negative reviews accuse Vicki of poor communication, lack of care, and failing to advocate, costing one parent time with their children. A few clients feel misled by initial promises and left to fend for themselves.

Clients are divided: some praise John Dean as honest and cost-effective, while others report severe negligence, lack of communication, and lost cases. One client describes being given inadequate notice for a court date and ignored when trying to reschedule. Another calls the lawyer a disgrace.

Clients report that the firm's address is incorrect, specifically noting that it is no longer located near Queensgate Countdown in Lower Hutt, causing confusion.