Clients consistently praise the firm's advocates, especially Megan Williams and Karen Clarkin, for their professionalism, thorough preparation, and empathetic support in ACC and mediation cases. Reviews highlight that advocates quickly grasp complex details, ensure clients' voices are heard, and exceed expectations even under tight deadlines. The firm is described as outstanding, reliable, and dedicated, with several reviewers emphasizing a personal, caring approach that makes difficult situations more manageable.

Clients praise the firm's friendly and helpful staff, clear explanations, and honesty. One reviewer found a lawyer difficult to locate, which was a minor concern.

Clients describe the experience as really great, praising the team as lovely, knowledgeable, and accommodating.

Clients praise David Oliver as a down-to-earth, friendly, and highly professional lawyer. One reviewer expressed satisfaction with his service, noting they would use him again but hoped not to need to, implying effective resolution. The feedback highlights a positive client experience with clear communication and professionalism.

Clients frequently praise the firm's professionalism and excellent service, particularly highlighting solicitors Edward Bostock and Roger Philip for their expertise and sincerity, especially in conveyancing and property matters. However, one review describes a negative experience with poor communication, rudeness, and lack of empathy, suggesting inconsistency in client care.

Clients overwhelmingly praise Eric Forster as a great lawyer, with several 5-star reviews highlighting his excellent service, professionalism, and ease of dealing with him. One reviewer specifically notes he is the go-to lawyer for anything. However, a single 1-star review criticizes his personal assistant as unhelpful and dismissive, suggesting the assistant's poor attitude reflects on the firm. Overall, clients recommend his services, with a minimal but notable concern about front-desk handling.

Reviews are mixed. Some clients praise the firm for helping with home purchases and call it 'highly recommended.' However, multiple negative reviews cite poor service, high costs, rudeness, and incompetence, with one complaint about a $2500 charge plus extra fees. A client also mentioned rude front-desk staff and a lawyer who repeatedly used the wrong name.

Clients frequently praise the firm for providing empathetic, supportive guidance during stressful employment disputes, with specific commendation for staff members Vicki, Isabelle, Kim, and Jess for their professionalism and care. However, a serious complaint describes a year-long delay, lack of communication, and wasted fees, leaving the client feeling hurt and humiliated.

Clients appreciate the firm's effective handling of property transactions, with one review highlighting a wonderful experience selling a house.

Clients express dissatisfaction with the service provided by Jonathan Heaphy, with one reviewer citing unhappiness and refusing to use the firm again.

Clients describe the firm positively with one review stating it is 'very good'. However, there is limited feedback available, making it difficult to identify common themes or specific praise beyond general satisfaction.

Reviews for McDonald Brummer are overwhelmingly negative, with multiple clients alleging fraud, poor communication, and mishandling of estates. Several reviews mention specific lawyer George Brummer, accusing him of making false statements to the Law Society, ignoring executor requests, and failing to disclose loans. One positive review praises David for his knowledge and patience in handling a difficult family member. Common themes include frustration with estate administration and lack of transparency, leading to a strong recommendation to avoid the firm.